Sister Megan Rice with Michael Walli, 68, a veteran and Greg Boertje-Obed, 57, a carpenter face decades in prison for protest against nuclear weapons
We continue to ask for your support and help. On October 1, we
received word that Judge Amul Thapar denied the motion to dismiss the
sabotage conviction as well as denied the motion for a new trial. For
complete background information please visit www.transformnowplowshares@ wordpress.com
In his ruling dismissing the defense Rule 29 motion and upholding
the sabotage conviction for the Transform Now Plowshares resisters,
Judge Amul Thapar has left the door open for the government to argue for
the maximum thirty year sentence.
The pre-sentencing reports prepared by the Probation Office are
likely to recommend sentences ranging up to 12 years—the recommendations
take into account the record of past convictions, so Megan, Michael and
Greg are likely to each have a different range; Greg, for instance, has
indicated his guideline range is 6.5-8 years. For Greg, any sentence
less than six and a half years would represent a downward departure.
Judge Thapar’s ruling included a statement that the nature of the offense has to be taken into account at sentencing1, suggesting he may be open to consider a “downward departure” from the pre-sentencing report’s guidelines.
While we all believe that the real criminal and dangerous activity
lies in the ongoing work of Y-12, and that Michael, Greg and Megan
should be released immediately from jail, we also know that this is a
very unlikely scenario. The reality is the three will remain
incarcerated for some additional amount of time. They never asked for
nor expected a “get out of jail free” card. Instead, they offered their
lives and freedom freely and without expectation. By asking for downward
departures, they are in fact giving the judge the opportunity, a gift
so to speak, to recognize the difference between the letter of the law
and the spirit of the law and for him to publicly proclaim his humanity
and compassion by granting a downward departure from guideline sentences
that can range up to 12 years.
The TNP support team therefore asks that letters to Judge Thapar
continue and should encourage him to sentence with downward departures
from the high sentencing guidelines which can range up to 12 years. Even
if you’ve written a letter in the past or sent in a pre-written
postcard, you can still write another. They seem to have an effect as
Judge Thapar has referred to the high volume of letters and postcards
and he has posted a few on legal record himself.
Please continue to send your letters to:
US District Judge Amul R Thapar
c/o Professor Bill Quigley
Loyola Law Clinic and Center for Social Justice
7214 St. Charles Avenue
Campus Box 902
New Orleans, LA 70118
Please feel free to post and share this statement on your facebook page. Peace, the TNP support team.
1 “The defendants’ non-violence thus does not affect the
question facing the Court today: whether a reasonable jury could find
the defendants guilty. Of course, the defendants’ non-violence will be
relevant at sentencing, since the Court must account for both the
“nature and circumstances of the offense and the history and
characteristics” of the defendants. See 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a)(1). Given
the obvious differences between the defendants and the paradigmatic
saboteur, those factors surely will be worthy of discussion. But because
those differences do not lessen the defendants’ liability under §
2155(a), the Court denies the defendants’ Rule 29 motion.” [Memorandum
Opinion and Order, US District Court, Eastern District of Tennessee,
Northern Division, Knoxville; 1 October 2013]
No comments:
Post a Comment