December 3, 2013
| SOURCE
In the days running up to Thanksgiving, Walmart urged its
workers to donate food to their most in-need colleagues. You know,
instead of Walmart having to pay said workers a livable wage. When
people ask me what libertarianism looks like, I tell them that. By
people I mean atheists, because for some stupid reason, far too many of
my non-believer brethren have hitched their wagon to the daftest of all
socio-economic theories.
It doesn’t help when atheist luminaries publicly extol
their libertarianism. Penn Jillette writes, “What makes me a libertarian
is what makes me an atheist—I don’t know. If I don’t know, I don’t
believe….I’ll wait for real evidence and then I’ll believe.”
Well, the only excuse Jillette has for his breathtaking
ignorance is that he earns his living performing as a Las Vegas
magician. Also, he graduated from a clown college.
Famed science author and editor of Skeptic magazine Michael Shermer says he became a libertarian after reading Ayn Rand’s tome Atlas Shrugged.
Wait, what? That’s the book that continues to inspire college
sophomores during the height of their masturbatory careers, typically
young Republicans (nee fascists). But unless your name is Congressman
Paul Ryan (R-WI), most people grow out of the, “Screw you, I have mine”
economic principles bestowed by the Russian-born philosopher by the time
they’re legally old enough to order their first beer.
Atheists like to joke that faith makes a virtue out of not
thinking about things, but the belief in libertarianism is an act of
faith given libertarianism has not only never been tried before
anywhere, but most of the world’s leading economists denounce it as a
folly that would exacerbate the central economic challenges we face
today—most significantly, wealth disparity.
When I hear an atheist say he is a libertarian, I know he's
given absolutely no thought to it other than the fact that he likes the
sound of no foreign wars and no drug laws. The aphorism that
libertarians are Republicans with bongs is just about spot-on. Thinking
Ron Paul is a genius because he’s anti-war and anti-drug laws is like
thinking a Big Mac is good for you because it has lettuce and a pickle.
Atheists who embrace libertarianism often do so because
they believe a governing body represents the same kind of constructed
authority they’ve escaped from in regards to religion. This makes sense
if one is talking about a totalitarian regime, but our Jeffersonian
democracy, despite its quirky flaws, is government by the people for the
people, and it was the federal government that essentially built the
great American middle-class, the envy of the world. In an op-ed titled “Abject Failure of Reaganomics,”
Robert Parry writes, “From the New Deal policies of the 1930s through
other reforms of the 1940s, 1950s and 1960s, from Social Security to
Wall Street regulation to labor rights to the GI Bill to the Interstate
Highway System to the space program’s technological advances to Medicare
and Medicaid to the minimum wage to civil rights.”
But then came the period of Reagan’s holy trinity:
privatization, deregulation and free trade. Now here we are today,
facing the largest economic crisis since the 1930s. Libertarianism will
serve only to replace government with a feudal serf model, which is what
corporations are pushing so hard to achieve. In short, libertarianism
can be described as anti-communism or "capitalism with the gloves off."
With communism, property is theft; capitalists are thuggish villains;
workers rule; the poor are oppressed. With libertarianism, property is
sacred; all governments are bad; capitalists are noble heroes; unions
are evil; and the poor are pampered good-for-nothings.
No comments:
Post a Comment